Conservative Group Attempts To Stop Reparation Payments In Evanston

Must read

Black Information Network
Black Information Network
Black Information Network is the first and only 24/7 national and local all-news audio service dedicated to providing an objective, accurate and trusted source of continual news coverage with a Black voice and perspective. BIN is enabled by the resources, assets and financial support of iHeartMedia and the support of its Founding Partners: Bank of America, CVS Health, GEICO, Lowe’s, McDonald’s USA, Sony, 23andMe and Verizon. BIN is focused on service to the Black community and providing an information window for those outside the community to help foster communication, accountability and deeper understanding. Black Information Network is distributed nationally through the iHeartRadio app and accessible via mobile, smart speakers, smart TVs and other connected platforms, and on dedicated all-news local broadcast AM/FM radio stations. BIN also provides the news service for iHeartMedia’s 106 Hip Hop, R&B and Gospel stations across the country. Please visit www.BINNews.com for more information.
Photo: Getty Images

Evanston’s historic reparations program is facing a class action lawsuit, WTTW reports.

The city had established a reparations program to address the housing discrimination and segregation in Evanston in the 1900s. The original program included distributing $25,000 to eligible Black households for home repairs, down payments, or interest or late penalties owed to the city.

Officials expanded the program to dole out cash payments to Black residents to use at their discretion.

However, a lawsuit alleges that the city’s reparation program violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment by using “race as an eligibility requirement.”

“In this instance, the program does not limit eligibility to people who have actually experienced discrimination,” Christine Svenson, one of the attorneys representing plaintiffs from the conservative nonprofit Judicial Watch, said. “More race-neutral means could have been utilized by the city of Evanston, insofar as they could have asked for people to provide proof of housing discrimination, and they did not, so it’s overly broad.”

Svenson added that the Supreme Court has ruled “that they are not in the business of remedying societal discrimination.”

Justin Hansford, a Howard University law professor, pointed out the flaws in the 14th Amendment argument.

“The two mistakes in that thinking are No. 1, the mistake of feeling that the 14th Amendment is asking that we blind ourselves to reality and pretend that racism can be addressed through colorblindness,” Hansford said in a statement. “And I think that is not the original intent of the 14th Amendment.”

The Black Information Network is your source for Black News! Get the latest news 24/7 on The Black Information Network. Listen now on the iHeartRadio app or click HERE to tune in live.

From the Web

spot_img